asebowedding.blogg.se

1. #Customize Zbrush 4 Interface Plus Button And#
2. #Customize Zbrush 4 Interface Manual To Do#
3. #Customize Zbrush 4 Interface Install A Custom#

Customize Zbrush 4 Interface Install A Custom

Don't worryhere shortly, we'll install a custom interface that will make it easier. Having the ability to make ZBrush work for you is an essential skill you definitely should know, in this easy to follow video I break each feature down check out all In this section, we'll get familiar with the ZBrush Interface. Learn how to be efficient by customising the ZBrush Interface During this course I will show lecture by lecture a different customisation feature of ZBrush.

Saying "well you can select it by." doesn't cut it, IMHO.Buttons Size. An icon for Snapping tools, as well as for simple object selection ("Q" hotkey in Maya and Max). If Andrew wants to keep the current transform gizmo.that's fine, as long as there is a "Free Transform" icon available on the toolbar in every room. These are just some of the most rudimentary options that are currently in a convoluted state, IMHO. It feels so awkward to have to go through a tool menu just to place an object where you want it, rotate it, or scale it.

That may be cool with current LW users, but it's not so cool when you are coming from another package.A slider, also known as a track bar, allows users to set or adjust a value. That is the one thing I hate about Lightwave.in their quest to be completely different they choose to bastardize instead of standardize. After setting the slider it is necessary to restart ZBrush before the change will take effect.The key objective here should not only be to clean up the toolset and place tools where they make sense and can easily be found, but to STANDARADIZE! Stick to common industry standards for common tools/commands. However, note that the text on the buttons does not increase in size. Setting the slider to a higher value will increase the size of buttons, switches and so on.

The cost/benefit doesn't support that approach. Just for the sake of being different. You can't do that if you purposely rename all your tools, rearrange all the hotkeys, re-order common workflows. Icons: An icon is a simplified image serving as an intuitive symbol that is used to help users to As a software vendor, one of your primary goals is to make it as user friendly as possible (while fulfilling it's purpose).

Customize Zbrush 4 Interface Plus Button And

What if there was an option to turn them off?3. To open it, you click on the plus button and drop down list appears of the rooms you can choose from.2. We could have a prompt come up and warn the user, that way it wont close accidentally. Some people love icons they work fast and comfortable with icons some hate it and prefer text buttons, you have choice,now you don't.You could place most used brushes and widgets in most comnfortable place for you and you could remove/hide tools you don't use at all or not much.Possibilities are close button on the room makes it very easy to close it by accident,I think room should be closable by using right click menu.If I close room how I open it again ?2)I thing placing any icons or anything in 3D spaceview is wrong even if transparent (like quad view and full view) I don't think I need icons for that and for sure not in that place.3)Why you think we need a quadview so badly ? Did a lot of 3DC users asked about quadview ? Current cameras are fine, quadview should be an option maybe in menu not a button in 3D viewport, doesn't make much sense for me4)How you imagine 'custom room' ? Voxels + uvs in same room ? Custom rooms doesn't make any sense for me.Explain what you what achieve with that.5)Why there is such big gap between File Edit View ?6)Why Main program menu switched place with room tabs menu ? Main menu should be always on top (like in every other software on earth)The + button for creating 'custom' room doesn't make much sense.It looks exactly like Firefox browser,you need it in Firefox to create pages on the fly but you don't need dedicated + button in 3DC because you won't create many rooms on the fly.You didn't explained yet how custom room are suppose to work and look(whole custom room concept doesn't make sense for me) but you already reserved button for it ?1. I had an idea that the help would be "built" in also, you hover over an item and there's a popup with the text explanation and a button to view a brief video explaining what the tool is used for and how to use it.We don't know if it's complex,maybe it's easy for Andrew.If we got custom UI you could tailor your interface the way you work and it would speed you up because all buttons and menus would in good positions and look fine for you and not UI designer think it's good.That's a big difference.Like.

However, in the visual representation, the parents are the children.In my opinion the rearrangement of Tabs to the Top of the hierarchy is one of the strongest ideas we had a chanceTo look at.Just dismissing this solution because no other program does something like this is a pretty hollow argument.In fact 3DC does something which is pretty different from most programs - it offers several completelyDifferent workspaces which look very different and offer different tools. The reason for this is that the menubar is a child of the rooms, so that rooms are parents of the menu bar. Andrew also thinks this is a problem and so it will be removed from the mockup6.

No one is advocating that 3DC become a carbon copy through and through.but there is no reason not to adhere to common INDUSTRY STANDARDS for the simplest of functions/commands. Thank you.The problem with that line of thinking is that the vast majority of users are utilizing 3DC in SUPPORT of what they are doing in a major 3D Application (not Sensable), you appeal to thousands and thousands more users by keeping simple common industry standards with those programs.it makes no sense to use different conventions of doing the VERY SAME FUNCTIONS.just for the sake of being different.I think some people just like being "different".and that's fine in your personal life, but we are talking about software here (software that is largely used to work in conjunction with major 3D applications).the chief of which is to make the software as user friendly (familiar) as possible. I think Seans proposal opens up interesting options.We are just feeling this out, the idea is to be creative, and to creatively solve problems. The File Save dialogMeaning that File/Import inside the Paint-Room opens a 3D model for Painting.The same File/Import chosen from the Voxel-workspace however could issue the Merge command which loads a mesh forVoxel-conversion. The proposed Tab-solutionGives better indication of the currently active workmode and it also would allow using e.g.

Customize Zbrush 4 Interface Manual To Do

Well, if we had only one modelling space, then this wouldn't even be a UI concern.A tool centric interface? or object centric interface?I prefer object centric - the views should be based on what part of the object you want to view, not what tools you're going to use. Recently folks have been asking to reference poly-mesh in voxels. In which case I like that.As an example. It should be smooth and "honest".I really think the separate rooms paradigm has to go - it limits what you can do.Unless it is simply an equivalent of menu-sets. You're telling me it needs to STAY convoluted simply because it's a "Sculpting" application?Yeah, the interface should speak it's usability and simplicity. Upon import, if you want to scale, rotate, move or select.you have to dig through the manual to do so.